APHC010416482019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 20121/2019 Between: 1. K CHENDRAYUDU, S/O THIPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O 13/440, ANANTHASAGAR COLONY, ANANTAPURAMU , ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPURAMU , ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU, A ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAPTADU POLICE STATION. RAPTADU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, RAPTADU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 6. MR RAMANJINEYA REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. TAHSILDAR, RAPTADU MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 7. MR DIWAKAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED MAJOR, OCC. MANDAL REVENUE INSPECTOR, RAPTADU MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 8. MR DASARI NAGENDRA, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED MAJOR, OCC. VRO, RAPTADU RAPTADU MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MA NDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents No. 4 in not registering the crime against the respondents Nos. 6 to 8 based on the petitioner's complaint dated 20.11.2019 though the complaint is received by the higher authori.ies i.e. respondent No. 2 and 3, is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the respondents 2 to 4 to register the crime forthwith against the respondents 6 to 8 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th respondent to restore the petitioner's name in the web-land as pattadar and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac. 4.95 cents in survey No. 147-3 of Raptadu Revenue Village and Mandal forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to register the Crime / FIR against the respondent Nos. 6 to 8 based on petitioner's complaint dated 20.11.2019 forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners/proposed respondents as respondents No. 9 and 10 in W.P No. 20121/2019 and other I.A s to meet ends of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SESHADRI GOALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.20121 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents No.4 in not registering the crime against the respondents Nos.6 to 8 based on the petitioner's complaint dated 20.11.2019 though the complaint is received by the higher authori.ies i.e. respondent No. 2 and 3, is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the respondents 2 to 4 to register the crime forthwith against the respondents 6 to 8 and pass….” 2. Ms. Sreelakshmi Palla, learned counsel, representing Sri Goalla Seshadri, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the Writ Petitioner is no more, and therefore, the Writ Petition may be closed. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 16.09.2025 MP 65 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:20121 OF 2019 Date: 16.09.2025 MP