AMRITPAL SINGH S/O SURMUKH SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11226/2025 · 2025-09-04
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29120 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29120 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35693] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11226/2025 Amritpal Singh S/o Surmukh Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Rampura, 24, Riya Police Station Sadar Kurali, District Mohali, Punjab. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar, District Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Subhash SHarma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 04/09/2025
1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Amritpal Singh S/o Surmukh Singh in FIR No. 120/2025 dated 14.08.2025 registered at P.S. Ramgarh Sethan District -Sikar, whereby the applicant- accused was charged under Sections 8/15 and 25 of NDPS Act.
2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further
[2025:RJ-JP:35693] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11226/2025] assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required the applicant-accused will be available. He also submits that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody.
4.
Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that without following mandatory provisions under the NDPS Act, contraband article is allegedly recovered from present petitioner. He further submitted that the recovered quantity of poppy straw is 3.4Kg and same is quite less than commercial quantity. He further submitted that except one case, no other criminal case is registered against the petitioner.
5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor.
6. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record.
7. On the basis of interception and search of truck No.PB11BU8793, police has recovered 3.4Kg of poppy straw from conscious possession of present petitioner and a case under Section 8/15 and 25 of NDPS Act is registered. The petitioner is in custody since his arrest on 14.08.2025. The recovered quantity is less than commercial quantity. One more criminal case is registered in year 2019 against accused but not under the NDPS Act.
8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore,
[2025:RJ-JP:35693] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11226/2025] looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused.
9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Amritpal Singh S/o Surmukh Singh, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled.
10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /190