1 2025:CGHC:48664 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 235 of 2016 1 - Narendra Kumar, S/o Late Brijlal Sahu, Aged About 32 Years 2 - Onkar, S/o Late Brijlal Sahu, Aged About 28 Years 3 - Satish Kumar, S/o Bhagwat Sahu, Aged About 25 Years 4 - Bhagwat, S/o Khorbahara Sahu, Aged About 60 Years 5 - Kamleshwari, D/o Late Brijlal Sahu, Aged About 30 Years 6 - Hamleshwari, D/o Late Brijlal Sahu, Aged About 25 Years 7 - Anusuiya Bai W/o Late Brijlal Sahu, Aged About 55 Years All are R/o Village Semra, Tahsil Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.. --- Appellants versus 1 - Duleshwari Bai W/o Bishant Ram, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Semra, Tahsil Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 2 - Uttra Bai, D/o Bishat Sahu, Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Rakhee, Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its The Collector District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.. --- Respondents ____________________________________________________________ For Appellants : None present For Respondent No.3/State : Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 22/09/2025 1. No one appeared on behalf of appellants in the first round. When this case is taken up for hearing in the second round in the post lunch session again there is no representation on behalf of appellants. BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.09.23 16:26:48 +0530 2 2. On 03.06.2025 and 04.07.2025 also, no one appeared on behalf of appellant to press this appeal. 3. In the aforementioned facts of the case, it is appearing that appellants have lost interest in prosecuting this appeal. Accordingly, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram