[2025:RJ-JP:2632] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 389/2025 Sheeshram S/o Madhosingh, R/o Tapau Saipur, Police Station Sone Ka Gurja, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 20/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.3/2023 registered at Police Station Sone Ka Gurja, District Dholpur (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 353, 307 & 34 of IPC, Sections 3, 5 & 25 of Arms Act and Section 11 of RDAA. Act. Investigation is being conducted for the offences punishable under Sections 353, 307 & 34 of IPC, Sections 3, 5 & 25 of Arms Act and Section 11 of RDAA Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that it is the case of no injury. Counsel further submits that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter. Counsel submits that co-accused Chhotu @ Gabbar has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.07.2023. Petitioner is in custody since [2025:RJ-JP:2632] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-389/2025] 04.02.2023 and trial will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. She submits that petitioner is a habitual offender and 13 other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that co-accused Chhotu & Gabbar has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court; charge- sheet has been filed in this matter; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Sheeshram S/o Madhosingh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording [2025:RJ-JP:2632] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-389/2025] the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J LALIT MOHAN /286