Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29108 (KAR)

MR RAKESH SUD v. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WP/18639/2021 · 2025-01-09

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:827 WP No. 18639 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 18639 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. RAKESH SUD S/O MAN MOHAN SUD, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT 6A SUKHI APARTMENTS, 17 RHENIUS STREET, LANGFORD TOWN, BENGALURU-560 025. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SARASWATHI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION (KSFC), KSFC BHAVAN, 1/1, THIMMAIAH ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 052. 2. PADMAMABA RICE MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED, NO.100/1, CITY CENTRE, OPPOSITE TOWN HALL, J.C.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS, KANDAYA BHAVAN, 8TH FLOOR, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:827 WP No. 18639 of 2021 4. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, E-WING, 2ND FLOOR, KENDRIYA SADAN, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034. 5. DISTRICT REGISTRAR AND REGISTRAR OF FIRMS, 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR, ANNEX BUILDING, BENGALURU CITY, DC OFFICE COMPOUND, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 009. 6. SUB-REGISTRAR-HESARAGHATTA, SUB-REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, H.C.PUTTASWAMY LAYOUT, NEAR NEW BUS STAND AND NEAR NADA KACHERI OFFICE, ADJACENT TO KEB OFFICE, HESARAGHATTA, BENGALURU NORTH TALUKA, BENGALURU-560 088. 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SOLADEVANAHALLI POLICE STATION, SH-39, SOLADEVANAHALLI, CHIKBANAVARA, (NEAR SOLADEVANAHALLI BUS STAND), BENGALURU-560 090. 8. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 9. ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, NO.49, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:827 WP No. 18639 of 2021 10. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA, ICAI BHAWAN, INDRAPRASTHA MARG, POST BOX NO. 7100, NEW DELHI-110 002. DISC@ICAI.IN …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NITIN HEGDE., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R3 & 5 TO 8; SMT. PREMA HATTI., ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. JAGADEESH.B.N., ADVOCATE FOR R9; SMT. SRIRAJA.S., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SUMANA NAGANAND., ADVOCATE FOR R10; R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondents 3 & 5 to 8 has appeared in person. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:827 WP No. 18639 of 2021 As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 13.12.2022, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The petition is listed today. As could be seen from the petition papers, the petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from four years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 6