IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6544 of 2023 --- Prem Prakash Prasad son of Late Hare Ram Prasad, residing at R-7/5, R-Type, Housing Colony, Adityapur, District- Seraikella-Kharsawan … … Petitioner Versus 1. The Jharkhand State Housing Board, Ranchi through its Chairman 2. The Managing Director, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Ranchi 3. The Estate Officer-cum-Competent Authority, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Ranchi 4. The Executive Engineer, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum …. … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms. Surabhi, A.C. to Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate Order No. 03 Dated: 19.02.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed to amend the designation of the respondent no. 3 as “The Estate Officer-cum-Competent Authority, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Ranchi” in course of the day. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the notice dated 04.09.2023 (Annexure-4 to the writ petition) issued by the respondent no. 3 in Eviction Case No. 263 of 2023 whereby the petitioner has been called upon to show cause as to why he should not be evicted from Flat No. R-7/5, Adityapur Housing Colony, Adityapur and the cost to be incurred in the said process be not realized from him. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that the petitioner has already responded the impugned notice dated 04.09.2023, however the respondent no. 3 has been sitting 2 W.P.(C) No. 6544 of 2023 tight over the same which has compelled the petitioner to prefer the present writ petition. 4. Ms. Surabhi, A.C. to Mr. Sachin Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, submits that if pursuant to the impugned notice dated 04.09.2023, the respondent no. 3 has not passed the final order, the same will be passed in accordance with law without further delay. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that the petitioner has already submitted his reply to the impugned notice dated 04.09.2023 pursuant to which, according to the counsel for the petitioner, no order has been passed by the respondent no. 3, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the said respondent to take up the present matter and to dispose of the same expeditiously in accordance with law after providing due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner/his representative. Ritesh/ (Rajesh Shankar, J.)