Balaji Silver Palace, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/21449/2025 · 2025-08-19
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29093 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29093 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010414942025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Between:
1. Balaji Silver Palace,, Represented by its Proprietor Prajapat Deepak Kumar, S/o Kesaram, Shop No. 39, Rajagopalachari Street, Governorpet, Vijayawada-520002. 2. Prajapat Deepak Kumar,, S/o Kesaram, Age 50 years. Resident o 16, Pisapati Vasi Street, Suryarao Pet, Vijayawada
3. Prajapat Rajendra Kumar,, S/o Deepak Kumar, Age 29 years. Resident of 29-21-16, Pisapati Vasi Street, Suryarao Pet, Vijayawada
1. The State of Andhra Prades Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Station House Officer, Sattenapalli Town Police Station, Palnadu District. 4. Kadiyala Nikitha, W/o C Siripuram Village, Medikonduru Mandal, Palnadu District. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21449 OF 2025
1. Balaji Silver Palace,, Represented by its Proprietor Prajapat Deepak Kumar, S/o Kesaram, Shop No. 39, Rajagopalachari Street, Governorpet,
2. Prajapat Deepak Kumar,, S/o Kesaram, Age 50 years. Resident o 16, Pisapati Vasi Street, Suryarao Pet, Vijayawada-520002. 3. Prajapat Rajendra Kumar,, S/o Deepak Kumar, Age 29 years. Resident of 16, Pisapati Vasi Street, Suryarao Pet, Vijayawada-520002. ...Petitioners AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, , Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Station House Officer, Sattenapalli Town Police Station, Palnadu
4. Kadiyala Nikitha, W/o Chatanya Srinivas, Age 31 years. Resident of Siripuram Village, Medikonduru Mandal, Palnadu District. ...Respondents IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
1. Balaji Silver Palace,, Represented by its Proprietor Prajapat Deepak Kumar, S/o Kesaram, Shop No. 39, Rajagopalachari Street, Governorpet,
2. Prajapat Deepak Kumar,, S/o Kesaram, Age 50 years. Resident of 29-21-
3. Prajapat Rajendra Kumar,, S/o Deepak Kumar, Age 29 years. Resident of
...Petitioners h, , Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home
3. The Station House Officer, Sattenapalli Town Police Station, Palnadu hatanya Srinivas, Age 31 years.
Resident of ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the arbitrary action of the 3rd Respondent in harassing/threating the petitioners and not unfreeze the petitioner business bank account, by accepting the sureties as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and Consequently, to direct the 3rd respondent to unfreeze the 1st petitioner business SBI Current Account No. 32798131801, Governerpet Branch, Vijayawada by accepting the relevant sureties or security as per due process of law and not to involve in the business of the Petitioners and not to harass the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3'’'^ respondent not to call the petitioners to police staiton; till pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to unfreeze the 1st petitioner SBI Current Account No. 32798131801, Governerpet Branch, Vijayawada; till pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: M V V R SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21449 OF 2025 This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “… pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the arbitrary action of the 3rd Respondent in harassing/threating the petitioners and not unfreeze the petitioner business bank account, by accepting the sureties as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and Consequently, to direct the 3rd respondent to unfreeze the 1st petitioner business SBI Current Account No. 32798131801, Governerpet Branch, Vijayawada by accepting the relevant sureties or security as per due process
of law and not to involve in the business of the Petitioners and not to harass the petitioner and pass…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 20.08.2025. KKV
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.21449 of 2025
Dated.20.08.2025
KKV
01