Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29088 (PNJ)

RANI BAMOTRA v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CWP/15218/2004 · 2025-05-01

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 778 Rani Bamotra State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. dated 31.12.1997 and 10.09.2004 and medical reimbursement to the petitioner w.e.f. 11.10.1998 to 24.03.1999 and w.e.f. 26.04.1999 to 2. bills of Rs.1,28,730/ however, regarding the treatment for the aforesaid period, it being an outdoor treatment, the same is not reimbursable in view of the instructions dated 31.12.1997, Annexure R 3. revived, in case 01.05.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rani Bamotra Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the letters dated 31.12.1997 and 10.09.2004 and directing the respondents to grant medical reimbursement to the petitioner w.e.f. 11.10.1998 to 24.03.1999 26.04.1999 to 14.03.2000. Learned State counsel states that reimbursement of medical bills of Rs.1,28,730/- for kidney transplant has however, regarding the treatment for the aforesaid period, it being an outdoor treatment, the same is not reimbursable in view of the instructions dated 31.12.1997, Annexure R-1, to which no counter was filed. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case lis still subsists. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15218-2004 (O & M) Date of decision: 01.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, made in the present petition is for quashing the letters directing the respondents to grant medical reimbursement to the petitioner w.e.f. 11.10.1998 to 24.03.1999 Learned State counsel states that reimbursement of medical for kidney transplant has already been granted, however, regarding the treatment for the aforesaid period, it being an outdoor treatment, the same is not reimbursable in view of the instructions , to which no counter was filed. ving the petitioner with a liberty to get it (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.02 13:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.