Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29080 (AP)

N SREENIVASULU v. CORRESPONDENT ( P.H.R.J.B) AND 3 OTHERS

WP/25041/2017 · 2025-09-11

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010415502017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 25041/2017 Between: 1. N SREENIVASULU, S/O. RAMANAIAH, AGE 42 YEARS, OCC: ATTENDER, PJ-LR.JAWAHAR BHARATHI AIDED JUNIOR COLLEGE, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. CORRESPONDENT P H R J B AND 3 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS CORRESPONDENT, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT-524201. 2. THE PRINCIPAL, P.H.R.JAWAHAR BHARATHI AIDED JUNIOR COLLEGE, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT-524201. 3. THE RECTOR, VISVODAVA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS_ KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT-524201. 4. THEBOARD OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION AP, D_NO. 48-18-2 /A. NAGARIUNA NAGAR COLONY. ONN. NTR HEALTH UNIVERSITY. VIIAVAWADA - 520008, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in passing oral orders Dt:07-07-2017, terminating the petitioner from the service, though he is fully eligible and entitled for regularization without following due process of law is as illegal, arbitrary, 2 unjust and against the Principles of Natural Justice, consequently set aside the said oral termination order and direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in the service by regularizing the services of the petitioner with all consequential benefits along with continuity of service and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 31049 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service by suspending the oral termination orders Dt.07-07-2017 of the 2nd respondent and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP 34423 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased implead the proposed respondent as respondent No.5 in the above writ petition No.25041 of 2017 and as well as W.P.M.P.No.31049 of 2017 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G JAGADEESWAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V R MACHAVARAM The court made the following ORDER:- When the matter is called, Sri G. Jagadeeswar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri V. R. Machavaram, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Institution, submit that in view of the subsequent events occurred in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, they submit that the matter has become infructuous. 3 2. Recording the submission made by both the counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 12.09.2025 GVK 4 26 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.25041 of 2017 Date: 12.09.2025 GVK