Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29079 (ORI)

BADAL NAYAK v. ANURADHA NAYAK

RPFAM/107/2025 · 2025-05-09

Gourishankar Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No. 107 of 2025 Badal Nayak … Petitioner Mr. S.P. Patra, Advocate -versus- Anuradha Nayak … Opposite Party CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) 09.05.2025 I.A. No. 194 of 2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. This is an application for change of nomenclature from “RPFAM” to “W.P.(C)”. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 4. After having considered the submission as advanced by the petitioner and on going through the averments taken in the I.A., since the present proceeding can be assailed only in writ, the prayer for change of nomenclature from “RPFAM” to “W.P.(C)” stands allowed. 5. Accordingly, the I.A. stands disposed of. The present application be treated as W.P.(C) instead of RPFAM. Registry is requested to reassign appropriate number to the petition of the petitioner. (G. Satapathy) Judge S.Sasmal Designation: Jr. Stenographer