M/ s. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, v. Paladugu Sateesh
MACMA/360/2022 · 2025-03-12
V Srinivas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29079 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29079 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 360 OF 2022 Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 aggrieved by the Decree and Judgment passed in M.V.O.P.No.1022 of 2014, dated.21-03-2022 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-Cum-I Additional District Judge, Guntur. Betvreen: M/s. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, represented by its Divisional Manager, RIICO, Industrial area Jaipur. ...Appellant/2"‘^ Respondent AND
1. Paladugu Sateesh, died;
2. Paladugu Avvamma, wife of Paladugu Sateesh, aged 35 years, residing at Badepuram Village, Tadikonda Mandal, Guntur District.
3. Paladugu Vijaya Raj, s/o Sateesh, aged 21 years, r/o - do -.
4. Paladugu Keerthi, d/o late Sateesh, aged 17 years, r/o - do (Claimants)
5. Panuganti Koteswara Rao, s/o Anjaiah, D.No. 5-20, Gossalapenamaluru, Krishna District
% 6 Podili Tirupati Rao, s/ o Narasimha Rao, aged 30 years, driver of Tata Ace bearing no. AP16 T 0054, residing of Thullur Village and Mandal, . Guntur District, driver of the Tata Ace bearing no AP16 TX 0054. :».5* ^ (respondent no - 6 added as per the Orders in IA.No.732 of 2015 dt.30-07- 2015) ...Respondents lA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the
Judgment and Decree, dated.21-03-2022 in M.V.O.P.No.1022/2014, on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal -Cum- I Additional District Judge, Guntur, pending disposal of the MACMA and pass such other Order or Orders in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the above appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri M.S Bhanu Prasad representing Sri V Hemanth Kumar Counsel for the Respondents: - The Court made the following:
% THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS M.A.C.M.A.No.360 of 2022
JUDGMENT: Today, when the matter is called, Sri M.S. Bhanu Prasad Rao,
learned counsel representing Sri V. Hemanth Kumar
learned counsel for the Appellant/lnsurance Company seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present appeal and the same was endorsed on the bundle. Permission, as sought for, is accorded.
2.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any. shall stand closed.
Sd/- K KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-Cum-I Additional District Judge, Guntur, Guntur District (with records if any)
2. One CC to Sri. V Hemanth Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]
3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi
4. Three CD Cop\es Stu sree
HIGH COURT DATED:12/03/2025
JUDGMENT MACMA.No.360 of 2022 ANO^ ^ 1 2 MAR 2025 Sj ^ Current Section 5*<S,.^£'SPATCV'^irf(^ DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS