Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29074 (HP)

Simro Devi v. PINKU AND ANR

CMP.M/7/2025 · 2025-06-30

Vivek Singh Thakur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Simro Devi vs. Pinku and another CMP(M) No. 7 of 2025 30.06.2025 Present: Mr.H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the applicant- appellant. Mr.Vikas Rathore, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr.Rahul Minhas, Advocate, vice Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. CMP (M) No.7 of 2025 This application has been filed for condonation of delay of 17 days in filing the appeal. Prayer made in the application has been opposed by learned counsel for the respondents on the ground that day-to-day delay as required to be explained under law, has not been explained. Taking into consideration averments made in the application and submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, delay of 17 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered. Application stands disposed of. FAO No. of 2025 (FAOST/57679/24) Admit. No post admission notice is required to be issued to the parties, as they are duly represented. Power of Attorney(s) on behalf of respective respondents, if not already filed, be filed within four weeks. Records be requisitioned. List for hearing in due course after completion. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge June 30, 2025 (Purohit)