PURNA CHANDRA SINHA v. AUROBINDA PADHI,CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR,SRI JAGANNATH TEMPLE ,PURI
CONTC/1966/2025 · 2025-07-04
R K Pattanaik
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29072 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29072 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.1966 of 2025
Purna Chandra Sinha …. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Nayak, Advocate
-Versus-
Aurobinda Padhi, Chief Administrator, Sri Jagannath Temple, Puri …. Opposite Party /Contemnor Mr. S. Behera, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 04.07.2025
01.
1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.
2. Instant contempt petition is filed by the petitioner for non-compliance of the Court’s order as at Annexure-P/1.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the opposite party/contemnor is still to comply the Court’s direction and in reply, Mr. Behera, learned AGA for the State prays further four weeks’ time to ensure compliance of the Court’s order dated 14th November, 2024 passed in W.P.(C) No.26998 of 2024 as at Annexure-P/1.
4. Considering the above submissions, the contempt petition stands disposed of with a direction to the opposite party/contemnor to immediately comply the Court’s order i.e. Annexure-P/1 as at Annexure-1 within next four weeks from
the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which, it shall be visited with action under the Contempt of the Courts Act.
5. Urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.
6. A copy of the order be handed over to learned counsel for the State for its onwards intimation to the opposite party/contemnor for its early compliance.
(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Balaram
Designation: Personal Assistant