THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY v. MD MUSTAKIM ANSARI
LPA/623/2023 · 2025-04-08
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29072 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29072 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:10863-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
L.P.A. No. 623 of 2023
With
I.A. No. 3789 of 2024
1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O.,P.S- Dhurwa, Ranchi. 2. Principal Secretary, Department of Co-Operative, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi-4, P.O. & P.S- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 3. Director, Co-operative Societies, Govt. of Jharkhand Project Building, P.O., P.S.- Dhurwa, District Ranchi. ... ... ... Appellants
Versus
1. Md Mustakim Ansari, Son of Late Matwar Mian Resident of Village- Pathuria, P.O-Sarkardih Police Station- Govindpur, District- Dhanbad. 2. Kishun Vishkarma, Son of Late Harkhu Vishkarma, Resident of Village- Govindpur, Dharmsala Road P.O and P.S- Govindpur, District- Dhanbad. 3. Sahdeo Sen, Son of Late Hadi Ram Sen Resident of Village- Govindpur (Beside High School), PO & P. S. Govindpur, District- Dhanbad. 4. Shanker Prasad, Son of Late Nand Prasad Resident of Village- Madarpala P.O- Polytechnic, P.S- Bank More, District- Dhanbad
5. Md. Eyakub Kazi @ Md. Yakub Ali, Son of Late Ali Nawaz Kazi Resident of Village-Nawatand P.O- Nagarkyari P.S- Govindpur District-Dhanbad. 6. Sakhi Ahmad, Son of Late Kalimuddin Ansari Resident of Village- Govindadih P.O-Bagdaha, P.S-, Rajganj, District- Dhanbad. 7. Kartik Chandra Mistri @ Kartick Chandra Mistry, Son of Late Mahru Mistri Resident of Village- Madandih, P.O- Barkhandia P.S. Nirsa, District- Dhanbad. 8. Buddhadeo Pandey @ Budhdeo Pandey, Son of late Ram Satya Pandey Resident of Village- Dholabud P.O-Motho P.S- Baliapur District- Dhanbad. 9. Rameshwar Saw, Son of Sri Jagbandhu Saw Village And P.O And P.S-Topchanchi, District- Dhanbad. 10. Managing Director, The Dhanbad Central Cooperative Bank Limited, P.O. and P.S. and District Dhanbad. … ... Respondents
--------- CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
---------
2025:JHHC:10863-DB
-2- For the Appellants : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents: _______
--------- 05/Dated: 08.04.2025 1) Counsel for the applicant has placed before us the order dt. 01.07.2024 in L.P.A. No. 236 of 2024 where this Court has refused to condone delay of 542 days in filing a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment in W.P.(S) No. 5986 of 2015. In that writ petition as well as in W.P.(S) No. 6160 of 2015, out of which the present .L.P.A. No. 623 of 2023 arises, the facts are identical and there is a common order passed.
2) In the instant Letters Patent Appeal, there is a delay of 365 days in filing the appeal and I.A. No. 3789 of 2024 is filed seeking condonation of the same. 3) Having regard to the order dt.01.07.2024 in L.P.A. No. 236 of 2024 and for reasons alike, I.A. No. 3789 of 2024 and also L.P.A. No. 623 of 2023 are both dismissed. (M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.)
(Deepak Roshan, J.) Sharda/MM/ Cp.02