[2025:RJ-JP:3448] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 439/2025 Sunny Sharma @ Rama Vadia @ Rama Bavadi @ Rama Shankar @ Ramlal S/o Bharmpal @ Birampal @ Kantilal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Hamirpur Jhule Ke Niche Kacchi Basti, Police Station Mantown, District Sawaimadhopur At Present Resident Of Village Gajiwali, Police Station Shyampur, District Haridwar, Uttrakhand (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 23/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.182/2023 registered at Police Station Ashok Nagar, District Jaiput City (South) (Raj.) for the offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC. Investigation is being conducted in the matter for the offences punishable under Sections 379 & 34 of IPC and Section 3/25(6) of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that co-accused Purshottam Babbri @ Ghanshyam has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated [2025:RJ-JP:3448] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-439/2025] 11.08.2023. Petitioner is in custody since 04.12.2024. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is habitual offender and 13 other cases have been registered against him and he has been found in possession of five live cartridges. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; co-accused Purshottam Babbri @ Ghanshyam has been granted bail by this Court; looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Sunny Sharma @ Rama Vadia @ Rama Bavadi @ Rama Shankar @ Ramlal S/o Bharmpal @ Birampal @ Kantilal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:3448] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-439/2025] 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /36