Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29063 (RAJ)

DATARAM BALAI S/O RAMNIWAS v. PHOOLARAM BALAI S/O MAHADARAM

CW/14762/2020 · 2025-07-17

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26717] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14762/2020 1. Dataram Balai S/o Ramniwas, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Kalota, Tehsil Khetri District Jhunjhunu (Raj) 2. Puran Balai S/o Gullaram, R/o Kalota, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj) ----Petitioners Versus Phoolaram Balai S/o Mahadaram, R/o Kalota, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Yadav with Ms. Kiran Yadav Mr. Hitanshu Joshi for Mr. Deepak Chauhan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 17/07/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 28.07.2020 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu, in Civil Misc. Appeal No.28/2015, whereby the appeal filed by the respondent was allowed, and against the order dated 15.10.2015 passed by the Court of Civil Judge, Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu, in T.I. Application No.50/2015, whereby the said application filed by the petitioners, was dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the suit filed by the respondent has finally been decided by the learned Trial Court and the grievance raised in the present petition does not survive for adjudication, therefore, the writ petition has rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. [2025:RJ-JP:26717] (2 of 2) [CW-14762/2020] 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel, the civil writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAHIL SONI /43