Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2906 (PNJ)

NASEEM AHMED v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/53842/2025 · 2026-02-10

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 206 CRM-M-53842-2025 Date of decision: 10.02.2026 NASEEM AHMED .... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. APS Deol, Senior Advocate with Ms. Dilpreet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Viney Phogat, DAG, Haryana. (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.17 dated 22.06.2025 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 7, 7-A, 13(1) (b) read with Section 13(2) Prevention of Corruption Act registered at Police Station Anti Corruption Burerau, Faridabad. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 13.11.2025 passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation. The learned State Counsel on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined investigation in terms of order dated 13.11.2025 and is not required for custodial interrogation. KUSUM 2026.02.11 20:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh CRM-M-53842-2025 -2- In this view of the matter, interim order dated 13.11.2025 is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS. Petition stands disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 10.02.2026 Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2026.02.11 20:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh