Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29057 (ALL)

SMT SAVITA JAISWAL AND 44 OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 15 OTHERS

WTAX/991/2025 · 2025-03-11

Piyush Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36343 Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 991 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Savita Jaiswal And 44 Others Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 15 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Imran Ali,Murtuza Ali Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and Mr. B.K. Pandey, learned ACSC along with Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned ACSC for the State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. It is clarified that the dismissal of this writ petition will not affect the right of the petitioner to take recourse to the remedy available under the law. Order Date :- 12.3.2025 Rahul Dwivedi/- Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad