Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29047 (KAR)

THE COMMISSIONER v. SRI.S.SEETHARAMAIAH

RFA/1425/2016 · 2025-06-23

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21665 RFA No. 1425 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1425 OF 2016 (RES) BETWEEN: THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE-560 002. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MOHAN KUMAR.K.V., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI.S.SEETHARAMAIAH S/O LATE S.SHAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT M.F.7/1, 'G' BLOCK, MIG, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 96. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-1. 3. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF MUZRAI AND ENDOWMENTS, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-1. 4. THE COMMISSIONER FOR MUZRAI AND ENDOWMENTS, CHAMRAJPET, BENGALURU-560 018. 5. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21665 RFA No. 1425 of 2016 K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-59. 6. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SOMESHWARA TEMPLE, ULSOOR, BENGALURU-58. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.SESHAGIRI RAO., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. RAJAKUMAR.M., AGA FOR R2 TO 5; SRI. A.G.GURURAJA., ADVOCATE FOR R6) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in 2016. Now we are in the month of June, 2025. The appeal is pending from nine years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21665 RFA No. 1425 of 2016 Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory application if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3.1