Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29045 (AP)

Smt. Mugu Shakuntala, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/21475/2024 · 2025-09-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010414962024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21475/2024 Between: 1. SMT. MUGU SHAKUNTALA,, W/O M.POLA RAO, AGE- 52 YRS, R/O UMILADA VILLAGE, SANTHABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM - ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMAIAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE CHAIRMEN, DISTRICT LEVEL POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY, HEAD QUARTERS - VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order, orders or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the Respondent No.1 in not taking any action on the report submitted by the 3rd Respondent vide C.C.No.02/2024/DPCA-VSP/2024dated 18.07.2024 as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and voilative of Articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to take immediate action on the report submitted by the 3rd Respondent vide.CC. No.02/2024/DPCA- VSP/2024dated 18.07.2024 under G.O.M.S No.112 Home (Legal-II) and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PRASANNALA KANCHARLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a writ, order, orders or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the Respondent No.1 in not taking any action on the report submitted by the 3rd Respondent vide C.C.No.02/2024/DPCA-VSP/2024dated 18.07.2024 as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and voilative of Articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to take immediate action on the report submitted by the 3rd Respondent vide.CC.No.02/2024/DPCA-VSP/2024dated 18.07.2024 under G.O.M.S.No.112 Home (Legal-II) and to pass ....” Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that respondent authorities have taken action against the erring officer and that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State is in attendance. In that view, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 21475 of 2024 08.09.2025 Mjl /*