Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29040 (JHR)

MRS. SUNITA SHARMA ALIAS SUNITA PARMANIK v. POONAM SHARMA

C.M.P./1055/2024 · 2025-01-20

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 1055 of 2024 Mrs. Sunita Sharma @ Sunita Parmanik aged about 53 years daughter of Late Rajdeo Sharma, resident of 326/1, Bhubaneshwar, Khorda, P.O. and P.S. Khorda, District Khorda, Odisha. ……… Petitioner Versus 1. Poonam Sharma wife of Late Manish Sharma daughter-in-law of Late Shaymdeo Sharma and great grandmother-in-law of Late B.K. Sharma 2. Maher Sharma (Minor) represented through her mother namely Poonam Sharma as legal guardian and daughter Sharma of Late Manish Sharma 3. Eshaan Sharma (Minor) represented through his mother namely Poonam Sharma as legal guardian and son of Late Manish Sharma Nos. 1 to 3 residents of B/9, Ratan Tower River Meet Road, Domuhani, P.O. and P.S. Sonari, Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. 4. Tanuja Sharma wife of Late Ashish Kumar Sharma 5. Rishika Sharma daughter of Late Ashish Kumar Sharma 6. Navin Kumar Sharma @ Navin Sharma son of Late Shyamdeo Sharma 7. Sunil Sharma son of Late Rajdeo Sharma 8. Kalyani Sharma wife of Late Ramdeo Sharma 9. Rima Singh @ Reema Sharma daughter of Late Ramdeo Sharma All residents of H. No.01, Monument Road, SB Shop Area, Bistupur, P.O. and P.S. Bistupur, Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum 10. M/S Tata Steel, Bistupur, P.O. and P.S. Bistupur, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. …… Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Kundan Kr. Ambastha, Advocate For the Opp. Parties-M/s Tata Steel:- Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, A.C. to Mr. G.M. Mishra ………. 03/Dated: 20/01/2025 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse under the law. 2. Learned counsel for the Opposite Party-M/s Tata Steel has got no objection. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Satyarthi/