GHANSHYAM AGARWAL S/O SHRI SHANTI LAL AGARWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
WMAP/167/2023 · 2025-08-28
Inderjeet Singh, Vinod Kumar Bharwani
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29038 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29038 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:34400-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 167/2023 In D.B. Civil (PIL) Petition No.14513/2022
1. Ghanshyam Agarwal S/o Shri Shanti Lal Agarwal, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of 3/40 Parasram Nagar, Dher Ke Balaji, Jaipur (Rajasthan)- 302023
2. Banwari Lal Soni S/o Shri Bhawani Shankar Soni, Aged About 64 Years, Resident Of Tej Vila, 17-A, Gali No.2, Ratan Nagar, Teen Dukan Sikar Road, Dher Ke Balaji, Jaipur (Rajasthan)-302023.
3. Satish Kumar Tambi S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal Tambi, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of 4/11, Parasram Nagar, Dher Ke Balaji, Jaipur (Rajasthan) -302023.
4. Subhash Chandra Pareek S/o Mathura Prasad Pareek, Aged About 70 Years, R/o 5A/28 Pareek Path, Parasram Nagar, Dher Ke Balaji, Sikar Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan) -
302023.
5. Kailash Chandra Sharma S/o Chauth Mal Sharma, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Psrasram Nagar, Sikar Road, Dher Ke Balaji, Jaipur (Rajasthan) -302039. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secratariat, Jaipur - 302001
2. District Collector, Collectorate Campus, 230, Madho Singh Road, Bani Park, Jaipur 302006
3. Commissioner, Jaipur Development Authority, Ram Kishore Vyas Bhawan, Indira Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur-302004.
4. Commissioner, Jaipur Municipal Corporation (Greater), Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyay Bhawan, Tonk Road, Lal Kothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302015
5. Zone Commissioner Murlipura Zone, Nagar Nigam Jaipur Greater, 90 Pravashi Nagar, Murlipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan-
302039.
[2025:RJ-JP:34400-DB] (2 of 2) [WMAP-167/2023] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Utkarsh Dubey, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Prateek Mathur, Adv. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 28/08/2025 Heard on the application for recalling of the order dated
30.09.2022. Counsel for the appellant submits that PIL petition was
disposed of by this Court vide order dated 30.09.2022 and it was observed as under:-
“The encroachments on main road, if any, are required to be removed.” Counsel further submits that despite several requests made to the concerned authorities, the encroachment concerned on the main road has not been removed as yet. Considering the statement made on behalf of the applicant, We deem it just and proper to recall the order dated 30.09.2022. Accordingly, this D.B. Civil (PIL) Petition No.14513/2022 is restored to its original number.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J JYOTI /1