NAGINDER SINGH PATHANIA v. PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND LABOUR COURT UT, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
CWP/8824/2021 · 2025-02-04
Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29030 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29030 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
"
1. In th but the pro notice to th
2. No hence, it c pursuing th
3. In v prosecutio
* /"01
2
"
!"# "
#
$$$$$ $"%&$!&"'( ) In the present petition, notice of mot the process fee has not been deposited ce to the respondents. No-one has put in appearance toda e, it can safely be presumed that the uing the present petition. In view of the above, the present ecution. *+,'-+-.
!
2
44-,3-+-5 !30#" "+,+--+-. %
%!
"$"%&$!&" of motion was issued on 10.09.2021, osited by the petitioner so as to issue e today on behalf of the petitioner at the petitioner is not interested in esent petition is dismissed for non-
( "$"%&$!&")
0%
&
&
021, issue ioner ed in - ) VINOD KUMAR 2025.02.06 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document