Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29030 (PNJ)

NAGINDER SINGH PATHANIA v. PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND LABOUR COURT UT, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

CWP/8824/2021 · 2025-02-04

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

" 1. In th but the pro notice to th 2. No hence, it c pursuing th 3. In v prosecutio * /"01 2 " !"# " # $$$$$ $"%&$!&"'( ) In the present petition, notice of mot the process fee has not been deposited ce to the respondents. No-one has put in appearance toda e, it can safely be presumed that the uing the present petition. In view of the above, the present ecution. *+,'-+-. ! 2 44-,3-+-5 !30#" "+,+--+-. % %! "$"%&$!&" of motion was issued on 10.09.2021, osited by the petitioner so as to issue e today on behalf of the petitioner at the petitioner is not interested in esent petition is dismissed for non- ( "$"%&$!&") 0% & & 021, issue ioner ed in - ) VINOD KUMAR 2025.02.06 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document