--1-- Cr.M.P. No. 37 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 37 of 2025 ---- Nistar Minz, aged about 74 years, Gender – Male, S/o Late Abraham Minz at present residing at South Railway Colony, Post Office and Police Station – Chutia, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand through Anti-Corruption Bureau, Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Rajiv Sinha, Advocate :- Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate :- Mr. Rohit Sinha, Advocate :- Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate :- Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate :- Mr. Shreesha Sinha, Advocate For the State :- Ms. Priya Shrestha, Advocate ---- 02/24.01.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondent State. 2. This petition has been filed for modification of the Order dated 29.08.2023 passed in Criminal Revision No.635 of 2021 arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No.11 of 2009 corresponding to Vigilance (Spl.) Case No.15 of 2009 whereby the revision application was allowed and the discharge petition rejected by the learned Court was set aside and the matter was remitted back to the learned Court to decide the discharge petition afresh. 3. The contention of the petitioner to modify the said order is that the respondent State has filed an affidavit in W.P. (Cr.) No.712 of 2023 in the matter of Satyanand Bhogta saying that he is an accused in the same FIR and still the case is being investigated as such money trail is not --2-- Cr.M.P. No. 37 of 2025 there and P.C. Act is not attracted and on this ground, he submits that the said order may kindly be modified to consider that aspect of the matter. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent State opposes the prayer that the affidavit was in another case not in respect of the petitioner and in view of that no modification is required. 5. The prayer of the petitioner appears to be misconceived one as the said revision was remitted back holding to decide the same afresh in accordance with law. No case of modification is made out and accordingly this petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/