APHC010414132023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21324/2023 Between: 1. V.NAGAMMA, W/O.V.GOPAL, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 3-213, MARUVUPULLI VILLAGE, RAMAPURAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SOMANDEPALLI POLICE STATION, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 4. ELLAMMA, W/O. VENKATA RAMUDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2/169-1, GANDHI NAGAR, SOMANDEPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 5. SESHU, D/O. VENKATA RAMUDU, R/O. D. NO. 2/169-1, GANDHI NAGAR, SOMANDEPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 6. GOPAL, S/O. VENKATA RAMUDU, R/O.D.NO.2/169-1, GANDHI NAGAR, SOMANDEPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 7. RAMANJ, W/O. RAMESH, R/O.D.NO.2/169-1, GANDHI NAGAR, SOMANDEPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering the FIR basing on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.08.2023 and further harassing the petitioner to withdraw the complaint is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently, direct the 3rd respondent to register FIR and conduct investigation into the offences in the complaint and pass 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering the FIR basing on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.08.2023 and further harassing the petitioner to withdraw the complaint is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently, direct the 3rd respondent to register FIR and conduct investigation into the offences in the complaint and pass ....” 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that during investigation, it is revealed that the subject matter relates to civil in nature and that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 21324 of 2023 19.08.2025 Mjl /*