Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29024 (RAJ)

BALRAM SON OF SHANTILAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11010/2025 · 2025-08-29

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34719] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.11010/2025 Balram Son Of Shantilal, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Malarna Chaud, Police Station Malarna Doongar, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present In District Jail Sawai Madhopur.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishnu Bohra, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 29/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.245/2025, registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur, for the offence(s) under Sections 316(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(2), 340(2), 61(2)(a) and 111(2)(b) of BNS and Sections 66-D of I.T Act and Section 13 of the Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 17.07.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:34719] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11010/2025] 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 17.07.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused petitioner- Balram Son Of Shantilal, in connection with FIR No.245/2025, registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-164