Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29023 (CHH)

IMRAN KHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4081/2024 · 2025-03-07

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:11495 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4081 of 2024 1 - Imran Khan S/o Mohd. Ahafaz Khan Aged About 30 Years R/o Ward No. 10, Bodla, Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Commissioner, Durg Region, District Durg (C.G.) 3 - The Collector, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 4 - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Kabirdham, District Kabirdham, (C.G.) 5 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bodla, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate For State/Respondents No.1 to 3 : Shri Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.5 : Ms. Ayushi Agrawal, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07/03/2025 1. By the instant petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.03.20 17:45:46 +0530 2 “10.1 To call for the records of the case for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 10.2 To issue an appropriate writ or order and set aside / quash the impugned order dated 19.08.21 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent no.3 and order dated 15.02.22 (Annexure P-2) passed by respondent no.2. 10.3 To issue an appropriate writ or order and declare the impugned order dated 19.08.21 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent no.3 and order dated 15.02.22 (Annexure P-2) passed by respondent no.2 is illegal and not sustainable in the eye of law to the extent of dismissal of service of the petitioner. 10.4 To issue an appropriate writ or order and direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to resume his services as daily wages employee as he was working prior to the order of regularization dated 23.07.20. 10.5 Any other relief deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted.” 2. The petitioner is directed to approach before respondent No.1/Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development for redressal of his grievance for which he has approached this Court within a period of 15 days and in turn respondent No.1 is directed to consider the case of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders. The respondents authorities are directed to consider the cases decided by this Court in WPS No.5954 of 2023 and WPS No.7684 of 2024 and pass appropriate orders in this respect within 15 days from the date of filing of a representation by the petitioner before respondent No.1. 3. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh