1 911 ca 10895-24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10895 OF 2024 IN FA/2762/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6613 OF 2018 IN FA/2758/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6615 OF 2018 IN FA/2759/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6621 OF 2018 IN FA/2762/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6617 OF 2018 IN FA/2760/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10896 OF 2024 IN FA/2760/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10897 OF 2024 IN FA/2760/2019 VISHAL BALBHIM JADHAV VERSUS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION PROJECT MAJBUTIKARAN DIVISION, OMERGA DIST. OSMANABAD AND ORS ... Mr. Abhijit Choudhari h/f Mr. Kulkarni Ashutosh S., Advocate for Applicant Mr. D. J. Patil, AGP for Respondent-State Ms. Sakshi Kale h/f Mr. A. B. Kale, Advocate for Respondent No.4 …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. DATED : 07/02/2025. 2 911 ca 10895-24 P. C. : A) ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10895 OF 2024 : The learned counsel for the respondents / claimants seeks time to file reply. Stand over to 21/02/2025 by way of a last chance. B) ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10896 OF 2024 : 1. Heard rival submissions. The learned counsel for appellant – acquiring body remained absent. 2. The applicants are seeking permission to bring themselves on record in the appeal being the legal representatives of sole respondent- claimant- Shivram Kundlik Arjunkar, who admittedly died on 02/01/2022, by condoning the delay of 850 days. 3. There is no strong objection from other side and the appellant / acquiring body infact should have filed this application. As such no question of condonation of delay. Thus, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause-B. 4. The appellant - acquiring body is directed to carry out the amendment within stipulated period. Application is accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-