Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2902 (UTT)

SANJAY KUMAR AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/124/2025 · 2025-03-03

Ashish Naithani, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures 2025:UHC:1468-DB COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 03.03.2025 WPCRL No. 124 OF 2025 Hon'ble G. Narendar, C.J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Heard Mr. Naman Kamboj, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition has rendered infructuous in view of the fact that the police have granted protection; and that the cause having been served, the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed. 3. The submission is placed and the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed accordingly. 4. Application, if any, also stands disposed of as not surviving for consideration. (Ashish Naithani, J) (G. Narendar, CJ) 03.03.2025 03.03.2025 Rathour