[2025:RJ-JP:39546] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11020/2025 1. Raju Mandiwal S/o Gheesaram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Raghunathpura, Police Station Gudhagodji, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu) 2. Rohit Bhakar @ Joni S/o Chhoturam, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dudiyon Ki Dhani Tan Bhodki, Police Station Gudhagodji, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). 3. Suraj Kumar S/o Prakash Chand, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Jitarwalon Ki Dhani Tan Gudhagodji, Police Station Gudhagodji, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Mahala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Jitesh Kumawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/09/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicants-accused Raju Mandiwal S/o Gheesaram, Rohit Bhakar @ Joni S/o Chhoturam, Suraj Kumar S/o Prakash Chand, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.0325/2025 dated 29.07.2025 registered at P.S. Gudha, District - Jhunjhunu for the offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 308(2), 119(1), 352, 351(2), 324(2) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:39546] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-11020/2025] 2. Learned counsel for petitioners offers to withdraw bail application of Raju Mandiwal. 3. Hence, the bail application of Raju Mandiwal is dismissed as withdrawn. We are only considering bail application of Rohit Bhakar @ Joni and Suraj Kumar. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against them is complete and they are no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicants do not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicants undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 5. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the allegation is against Raju Mandiwal and he intimidated complainant and further committed extortion by demanding money. He further submitted that at the most role of these petitioners are accompanying main accused Raju Mandiwal but they have not participated with Raju Mandiwal with the intention to commit the crime. He further submitted that the petitioner accused Rohit Bhakar and Suraj Kumar undertakes not to commit crime, in future. He also submitted that one of the case is still pending for investigation and it will take time. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. [2025:RJ-JP:39546] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-11020/2025] 7. Learned counsel for complainant has opposed the bail application of both the accused and submitted that they are habitual criminal and on they have threatened and intimidated different persons. 8. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 9. On 29.07.2025 complainant Amrendra Singh has lodged a report against three named petitioners for assault intimidation and extortion by using criminal force. During investigation these petitioners were arrested on 06.08.2025. The material on record indicate that three criminal cases were registered against Raju Mandiwal and in all three cases a charge-sheet is filed against him and same are pending before the trial court. Three criminal cases each were registered against Rohit Bhakar and Suraj Kumar. In one case against Rohit and two cases against Suraj Kumar investigation is pending. The main allegation in the statement of victim is against Raju Mandiwal. 10. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicants-accused are no more required in the investigation and they are in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicants-accused. [2025:RJ-JP:39546] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-11020/2025] 11. Thus, the instant bail applications filed on behalf of applicants-accused- Rohit Bhakar @ Joni S/o Chhoturam, Suraj Kumar S/o Prakash Chand, are hereby allowed and the applicants-accused are ordered to be released on bail with condition that each of the petitioner would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicants shall mark their attendance of every first and third Monday before P.S. Gudha, Jhunjhunu. (iii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iv) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (v) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 12. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /147