Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29011 (AP)

B.S. Swamy, S/o. Muthyalu v. The State of A.P rep. by its principle secretary

WP/42019/2016 · 2025-09-23

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010413762016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 42019/2016 Between: 1. B.S. SWAMY, S/O. MUTHYALU,, 5-36/10, JRC COLLEGE ROAD, SEETARAMPURAM. JAGGAIAHPETA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, SECRATARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT, CORPORATION, RTC HOUSE, VIJAYAWADA, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND M.D. 3. THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC JAGGAIAHPET, - 4. THE DEPUTY CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER M3M, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. THE REGIONAL MANAGER KRISHNA REGION APSRTC VIJAYAWADA, - ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the proceeding No TY/19(234)/14-Dy.CTM (MTM) dated 30-03-2015 by the 4th Respondent and not taking decision on the appeal preferred by the. Petitioner Dated 08- 08-2015 by the 5th Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the Proceedings No.TY/19(234)/14-Dy.CTM (MTM) dated 30-03-2015 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 51804 OF 2016 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th resspondent to take decision on the appeal prefered by the Petitioner dated 08-08-2015 forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR POTTURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR TRANSPORT (AP) 2. P DURGA PRASAD SC FOR APSRTC The court made the following ORDER:- The writ petition is filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following main relief:- “……declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the proceeding No TY/19(234)/14-Dy.CTM (MTM) dated 30-03-2015 by the 4th Respondent and not taking decision on the appeal preferred by the. Petitioner dated 08-08-2015 by the 5th Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the Proceedings No.TY/19(234)/14-Dy.CTM (MTM) dated 30-03- 2015.……” 2. The petitioner in the writ petition has challenged the inaction on the part of the 5th respondent in disposing the review petition dated 08.08.2015, preferred by the petitioner against the proceedings dated 30.03.2015. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner even in the revised call. 3 4. On 02.12.2016, this Court pleased to pass the following interim orders:- “Learned Government Pleader for Transport takes notice for 1st respondent. Sri P. Durga Prasad, learned counsel takes notice for respondent Nos.2 to 5. Pending further orders, 5th respondent shall consider petitioner’s review petition dated 08.08.2015 within six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate their decision thereon to the petitioner.” 5. Sri Aravala Rama Rao, learned Standing Counsel for respondents Corporation, submits that pursuant to the interim direction dated 02.12.2016 of this Court, the 5th respondent passed final orders vide proceedings dated 18.12.2015, whereby the case of the petitioner was rejected. By placing a copy of the said proceedings dated 18.12.2015 before this Court, the learned Standing Counsel submits that no further orders are required in the present writ petition. 6. Considering the above said submissions, the writ petition is disposed of by making the proceedings dated 18.12.2015 as a part of record. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.09.2025 GVK 4 121 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.42019 of 2016 Date: 24.09.2025 GVK