UNION OF INDIA v. SHRI S.K. DADICH S/O SH. CHIRANJI LAL DADICH
CW/15303/2023 · 2025-03-20
Avneesh Jhingan, Maneesh Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29007 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29007 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:12702-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15303/2023
1. Union Of India, Through Its General Manager, Western Central Railway, Jabalpur (M.p.)
2. Divisional Personnel Officer, Office Of Divisional Railway Manager, Western Central Railway, Kota. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Shri S.k. Dadich S/o Sh. Chiranji Lal Dadich, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Model Town, Khedli Phatak, Kota Junction Presently Working As Guard At Guard Driver Lobby Kota Junction, Kota.
2. G.p. Sharma S/o Sh. Kalyan Sahay Sharma, Aged About 48 Years, R/o House No. 185, Janakpuri, Mal Road, Kota Presently Working As Guard At Guard Driver Lobby Kota Junction, Kota.
3. Ashok Kumar Sharma S/o Sh. Ramesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 49 Years, House No. T-268/13, Near G.r.p. Police Station, Ganga Pur City Presently Working As Guard At Guard Driver Lobby Kota Junction, Gangapur City. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 20/03/2025
1. This petition is filed aggrieved of order dated 09.05.2023 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jaipur (for short the tribunal).
[2025:RJ-JP:12702-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-15303/2023]
2. The brief facts are that the respondents filed Original Application (O.A.) before the tribunal aggrieved of withdrawal and recovery of second MACP benefits. The impugned order dated 16.09.2014 was quashed by the tribunal and the matter was remitted back to decide the matter afresh after complying the principles of natural justice.
3.
Learned counsel for the parties are at ad idem that during pendency of this petition the issue involved in this case has been decided by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.08.2024 passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5946/2020.
4. In view of the above, no cause of action survives against setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter back by the tribunal.
5. The petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J DEEPA -40