2025:JHHC:10450-DB Page 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(Cr.) No. 945 of 2024(DB) ------ Md. Chand @ Md. Nazir aged about 28 years, son of Md. Nasir resident of LH/42, Sanga Road, Goushala, Sakchi, Kalimati, P.O. & P.S.- Sakchi, District- East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur. ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand; 2. The Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagannathpur, District- Ranchi; 3. The District Magistrate cum Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur Office at Old Gandak Road, P.O. & P.S.- Sakchi, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum; 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Jamshedpur, office at near Jubliee Park, P.O. & P.S.- Sakchi, Jamshedpur, District- Jamshedpur ... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Omiya Anusha (AC to AAG-IA) ------ 07/Dated: 4th April, 2025 1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that during the pendency of the instant petition, the order of detention has further been extended, as such, the petitioner wants to challenge the said order of preventive detention. 2. This Court is of the view that the earlier detention order was passed 2025:JHHC:10450-DB Page 2 on 25.09.2024. Thereafter, it has been extended again vide order dated 10.12.2024, by which the order of preventive detention of the petitioner has been extended for 25.12.2024 to 25.03.2025 which the petitioner intends to challenge by filing a fresh petition. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has sought for leave of this Court by not pressing the instant petition with a liberty to challenge the order passed by the authority afresh. 4. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel, the instant petition being WP(Cr.) No. 945 of 2024(DB) stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to challenge afresh the order passed by the authority in connection with the detention of the present petitioner. 5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Samarth