Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29003 (CHH)

SANSTHAPAK SHRI SHRI 108, SHRI RAMLAKHAN NILKANTH MAHARAJ VIKAS SAMITI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3376/2022 · 2025-04-21

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:17837 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3376 of 2022 1 - Sansthapak Shri Shri 108, Shri Ramlakhan Nilkanth Maharaj Vikas Samiti Sirouli, To The Secretary Rajeev Lochan Shashtri, S/o Late Ramlakhan, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Village Sirouli, Post Kathotiya, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Koriya Baikunthpur (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Public Grievances Prevention Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner, Surguja Division, District Surguja Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - The Collector, Koriya, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 4 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Manendragarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 5 - The Naib Tahsildar, Manendragarh, District Koriya- Baikunthpur (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Village Panchayat, Sirouli, Post Kathoutiya, Tahsil Manendragarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 7 - Amol Singh, Sarpanch, Village Pachayat, Sirouli, Post Kathoutiya, Tahsil Manendragarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 8 - Sundar Ram Kewat, S/o Late Panchamram Kewat, Husband Of The RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.04.23 10:57:58 +0530 2 Panch, R/o Village Sirouli, Post Kathoutiya, Tahsil Manendragarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. V. K. Pandey, Advocate For State/Respondent/s : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 21/04/2025 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time this petition has rendered infructuous and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 2) No objection from other side. 3) Permission is granted. 4) Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi