Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29000 (AP)

B MADHU @ B MADHU KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/6664/2024 · 2025-09-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010413762024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6664/2024 Between: B MADHU @ B MADHU KUMAR, , S/O.B.MARENNA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O.B.C.COLONY, N.NARASAPURAM GUNTAKAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT - 515201. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATI ON BEHALF OF STATION HOUSE OFFICER GUNTAKAL RURAL POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 2. GANIGA HABEEBUNNISA BEGUM, , D/O. G.MAHABOOB, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. BESIDE 1ST PETROL PUMP, HANUMESH NAGAR, GUNTAKAL TOWN, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. P RAVIKANTH Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed, by the Petitioner / Accused No.3, seeking to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No.120 of 2024 on the file of Guntakal Rural Police Station, Ananthapur District registered for the offences under Sections 329(3), 324(4), 115(2), 79 and 351 (3) read with 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sahita, 2023. 2 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that investigation in the present crime has been completed and charge sheet has also been filed. 3. Sri P.Ravikanth, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of by giving liberty to the Petitioner to file fresh petition seeking quashment of the final report. 4. In that view, the Criminal Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh petition seeking quashment of the final report against the Petitioner, if so advised. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.6664 of 2024 Dt.22.09.2025 Dinesh