Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6581 of 2024 ----- 1.Awadh Kishore Singh, aged about 75 years. 2.Shashi Shekhar Singh aged about 65 years. 3.Ram Rekha Singh aged about 63 years. 4.Kumar Singh aged about 62 years. 5.Abhy Singh aged about 50 years. All are sons of Late Matukdhari Singh, 6.Most. Shila Kuar @ Shila Devi aged about 62 years wife of Late Bibhuti Bhushan Singh, All are resident of village Basdah, P.O.-Palhey, P.S. Paton, District-Palamau, Jharkhand.
.......... Petitioners. -Versus- 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamau, Jharkhand. 3.The Additional Collector, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District-Palamau, Jharkhand. 4.The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar at Daltonganj, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamau, Jharkhand. 5.The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District-Palamau, Jharkhand. 6.The Circle Officer, Paton, P.O. & P.S. Paton, District- Palamau, Jharkhand
.......... Respondents. -----
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Lav Kr. Tiwary, A.C. to A.A.G.-V -----
Order No.04
Date: 10.02.2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have the threat of eviction/dispossession from their raiyati land, appertaining to Khata No.188, Plot No.10/G, Village- Basdah, Thana No.184, P.S. Patan, District Palamau, measuring total area of 60 acres, as the respondent-authorities have illegally demarcated and prepared a wrong trace map of Plot No.10/G instead of Plot No.10/A of village-Basdah.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a similar writ petition being W.P.(C) No.6821 of 2024 (Mithlesh Singh & Ors. Vs. the Secretary of Home Department, State of Jharkhand, Ranchi and Ors.) has been disposed of by this Court vide order dated 6th February, 2025 in the following terms :
“……………….7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of the prayer made in the present writ petition, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioners are given liberty to prefer a fresh representation along with the relevant documents on the present issue before the respondent No.2. On receipt of the said representation, the respondent No.2 shall get an enquiry conducted by a team of officers/officials headed by the respondent No.5 within six weeks from the date of filing of the said representation and pass appropriate order within two weeks thereafter. The respondent No.2 shall communicate the order as well as the enquiry report to the petitioners within one week thereafter……………………. “
3. Considering the fact that a similar writ petition being W.P.(C) No.6821 of 2024 has been disposed of by this Court vide order dated 6th February, 2025, the present writ petition is also
disposed of in terms with the said order.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) Rohit/
-2- W.P.(C) No. 6581 of 2024