Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28990 (HP)

Raksha Sharma v. STATE OF HP

CMP-T/169/2025 · 2025-06-27

Satyen Vaidya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Raksha Sharma, vs. State of H.P. & others CWPOA No. 5673 of 2020 27.06.2025 Present: Mr. Aman Parth Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Sood, DAG, for the respondents. CMP-T No. 169 of 2025 By way of this application, the respondents have sought leave to file the reply. Record reveals that by orders dated 11.9.2024 and 24.10.2024, the right of the respondents to file the reply was closed. The reasons explained in the application appears to be bonafide and keeping in view the nature of dispute, it will not cause any prejudice to the petitioner in case the reply of the respondents is taken on record, rather it will help the Court in adjudicating upon the matter completely and effectively. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The respondents are allowed to file the reply, which has already been placed on record. The application stands disposed of. CWPOA No. 5673 of 2020 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to file the rejoinder. Be filed on or before the next date. List on 11.8.2025. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 27th June, 2025 (kck)