IN TH 104 Labh Sing Sh. Uma S Chandigar CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate Be Singh and o was allowe entitled for consider th petition for consequent receipt of COCP-6141-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.6141 o Date of decision Singh Versus Uma Shankar Gupta, Director, Lo ndigarh and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Petitioner Labh Singh in perso Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Mr. Amtiaz Sandhu, AAG, Pu for respondent No.1. Mr. Hunarveer Sharma, Advoc HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 02.3.2023 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP-445 h and others vs. State of Punjab and ot allowed and it was observed that d for the revised pay scale. Respon er the claim of the petitioners as n for granting them revised pay sca uential benefits within a period of 0 t of certified copy of this order….” 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 6141 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-07.03.2026 …..Petitioner r, Local Government Punjab, …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA person. i, AAG Punjab with G, Punjab Advocate for respondent No.2. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 4454 of 2017 titled as “Labh and others”, whereby the petition that “…the petitioners are held spondents are thus directed to as raised in the present writ scale of Rs.5000-8100 with all of 03 months from the date of ….”; read with judgment dated VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.11 10.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 05.9.2024 ( in LPA No Singh and recorded as Short reply Singh, Exe Mohali. Th petitioner, w averments nothing rem three prev released to passed in L the petition COCP-6141-2025 (O & M) .2024 (Annexure P-2) passed by the D A No.335 of 2024 titled as “Nagar Co h and others”, whereby, in para 4 of rded as follows :- “4. Learned couns respondents/ writ pe consensus has been arr that writ petitioners wo the benefit afforded to years prior to filing of CWP-16560-2016 and w beyond that. Appellan satisfied if the relief as Bench is restricted a question shall be re weeks….” Today, learned counsel for r t reply dated 02.3.2026 by way of h, Executive Officer, Municipal Coun ali. The same is taken on record. Cop ioner, who is present in person in Cour Learned counsel for responde ments made in para Nos.6 to 9 of the ing remains due against the petitioner. previous years amounting to Rs.1 sed to the petitioner in compliance of ed in LPA-335-2024 on the basis of th etitioner himself. 2 the Division Bench of this Court gar Council, Dera Bassi vs. Labh 4 of the said order, it has been ounsel for appellant and petitioners submit that a arrived at between the parties s would restrict their claim to to them, for a period of three g of the earlier writ petition i.e. and would not claim any arrear ellant, it is stated would be ef as granted by learned Single d as above. The amount in e released within next two r respondent No.2 has filed ay of affidavit of Mr. Ravneet Council, Derabassi, SAS Nagar, . Copy thereof is supplied to the n Court. pondent No.2 has referred to the of the said reply to submit that tioner. Leave encashment for the Rs.10,200/- has already been nce of the order dated 05.9.2025 is of the undertaking as given by VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.11 10.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document made by are required is hereby March 07 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-6141-2025 (O & M) Heard. In view of the facts noted a by learned counsel for respondent N equired to be issued in the present cont reby disposed of. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 7, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 oted above and the submissions dent No.2, no further directions nt contempt petition and the same if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.11 10.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document