IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2787 of 2025 Decided on: 15.05.2026 Raj Kumar …….Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Agriculture Marketing Board and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Neelam Kaplas, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Kiran Lata Sharma, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner be allowed to rake up the issue raised in this petition with the Authority, by way of a representation, with direction to the Authority to decide the same within some reasonable time, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. This petition is accordingly disposed of with the observation that in case the petitioner approaches the Authority, by way of a representation, qua the reliefs prayed for in this petition, within four weeks from today, let appropriate call be taken thereupon within eight weeks thereafter, after affording an opportunity of hearing of the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 15, 2026 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?