Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28986 (KAR)

SMT NAGAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/37/2021 · 2025-01-08

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:581 WP No. 37 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 37 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.NAGAMMA W/O SHANKARAREDDY.T.N., AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.266, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 040. 2. SRI SRINIVAS G.R. S/O RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 315, GUNJURU VARTHURU HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 087. 3. SMT. SHOBHA W/O NARAYANACHARI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.12, KAACHAMARANAHALLI, VARTHURU HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 087. 4. SMT. MEENAKSHAMMA W/O GOPALACHAARI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.11/A, KAACHAMARANAHALLI, VARTHURU HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 087. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:581 WP No. 37 of 2021 5. SMT. PAAPAMMA W/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT HANDENAHALLI HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU. 6. SMT. PAVITHRA W/O KUNNA MAADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO. 495/1, VINAYAKA NAGARA, DOMMASANDRA, BENGALURU - 562 125. 7. SRI.RAVIKUMAR.V S/O VENKATASWAMAPPA.B, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.166, LAKSHMANAMURTHY NAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 016. 8. SMT. BHARATHI W/O DEVA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO. 52, GUNJURU, VARTHURU HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 087. 9. SMT. M.BHAVYA D/O MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO. 74, THUBARAHALLI, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 087. 10. SRI D.SURENDRA S/O PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO. 343, GUNJURU VARTHURU HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 087. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:581 WP No. 37 of 2021 11. SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA.G.M. W/O YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT 299, GUNJURU VARTHURU HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 087. 12. SMT. MEENA.S W/O SUDHAKAR.C, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.6, A NARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 016. 13. SRI NARAYANAPPA, S/O MUNIYALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT 298, GUNJURU, VARTHURU HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 087. 14. SRI B.V.VINOD S/O H.VISHWANATH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO. 145, NEAR MAARIYAMMA TEMPLE, BALAGERE, BENGALURU - 560 087. 15. SMT. RAMYA.G.V. W/O INDRESH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO. 60 'A', SHAMBHULINGESHWARA LAYOUT, CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI, R.T.NAGARA. 16. SRI RAMESH S/O MUNIERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.109, AADOORU VILLAGE, BENGALURU - 560 049. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:581 WP No. 37 of 2021 17. SMT. RATHNA.M W/O SHANTHAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.115, PARAPPANA AGRAHARA, BENGALURU - 560 100. 18. SRI.VENUGOPAL.G.M. S/O MUNIYAPPA.G.K., AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT THARABAHALLI, LAKKURU HOBLI, MALOORU TALUK, KOLAR. 19. SRI ARUN KUMAR S/O VENUGOPAL.G.M., AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT GUNJURU, VARTHURU HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 087. 20. SMT. YASHODHA.B.J. W/O CHANDRACHAARI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO. 257, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, GOLLARAPALLI, BENGALURU - 560 091. 21. SMT. CHANDRAMMA W/O CHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO. 156/B, V.KALLAHALLI, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VASANTH KUMAR.H.T., ADVOCATE) - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:581 WP No. 37 of 2021 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, 4TH FLOOR, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DISTRICT, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. 4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUK GRAMA PANCHAYATH, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for the respondents has appeared in person. - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:581 WP No. 37 of 2021 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 2 to 4 to consider the representation dated 11.06.2020 vide Annexures-E and F. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. The petitioners grievance is that they made representation in the year 2020 and the same is not considered as of today. Hence, a Mandamus is ordered directing respondents 2 to 4 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners vide Annexures-E and F in accordance with the law if not considered as of today, within eight weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 2