Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28981 (JHR)

MANJU DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./3372/2021 · 2025-09-15

Arun Kumar Rai, Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 3372 of 2021 ------ Manju Devi, W/o Suresh Kumar Das @ Suresh Das, age about 38 years R/o- Village-Gajure, Ward no. 04, P.O. – Dhab tham P.S.- Chandwara, Jhumri telaiya Dist- Koderma, Jharkhand, PIN- 825409 ... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Tinku Singh, Son of Late Laxman-Singh age about 28 years, Resident of Village-Gajure, P.O.-Dhab tham P.S.- Chandwara, Dist- Koderma, Jharkhand, PIN- 825409. ... Opp. Parties CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------ For the Appellant : Md. Nasim Akhtar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Mohua Palit, A.P.P. ------ 08/Dated: 22nd September, 2025 1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been listed under the heading “To be Mentioned” at the behest of office note dated 18.09.2025 due to some typographical error crept up in paragraphs-2, 3, 5 & 6 of the order dated 15.09.2025. 2. We have perused the office note dated 18.09.2025. 3. It appears from the order dated 15.09.2025 that there are some typographical errors in Paras-2, 3, 5 & 6 wherein the “criminal miscellaneous petition” has been mentioned as “writ petition”. 4. This Court, considering the same, is of the view that the order dated 15.09.2025 needs to be modified, as such, the said order is modified to the 2 extent that the “writ petition” as has been mentioned in paras-2, 3, 5 & 6 of the said order be replaced as “criminal miscellaneous petition”. 5. Accordingly, the order dated 15.09.2025 is modified to the extent as indicated hereinabove and the rest part of the order shall remain intact. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 22nd September, 2025 Samarth/Saurabh