Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
177 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 948 of 2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 28.03.2025
Rajender Singh .......... Petitioner Versus
Mr. Sumeet Dhull, Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Meham, District Rohtak and another .......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Akaant, Advocate, for the respondents
(through video-conferencing)
**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the One Time Settlement Scheme dated 24.03.2025 proposed by the respondents-Bank, the settled amount has been paid by the petitioner, thereby rendering the present petition as infructuous. [2]
Learned counsel for the respondents concedes the aforesaid factual position. [3] Dismissed as infructuous. [4] Rule stands discharged. [5] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed off.
March 28, 2025
( HARKESH MANUJA ) 'dk kamra'
JUDGE
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Dinesh Kumar 2025.03.28 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document