Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28980 (PNJ)

RAJENDER SINGH v. SUMEET DHULL AND ANOTHER

COCP/948/2025 · 2025-03-28

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

177 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 948 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.03.2025 Rajender Singh .......... Petitioner Versus Mr. Sumeet Dhull, Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Meham, District Rohtak and another .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Akaant, Advocate, for the respondents (through video-conferencing) **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the One Time Settlement Scheme dated 24.03.2025 proposed by the respondents-Bank, the settled amount has been paid by the petitioner, thereby rendering the present petition as infructuous. [2] Learned counsel for the respondents concedes the aforesaid factual position. [3] Dismissed as infructuous. [4] Rule stands discharged. [5] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. March 28, 2025 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) 'dk kamra' JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Dinesh Kumar 2025.03.28 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document