Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28971 (RAJ)

AJAD @ AJADI S/O LATE SH. MAMMAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11038/2025 · 2025-09-01

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35148] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11038/2025 Ajad @ Ajadi S/o Late Sh. Mamman, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Semla Kalan, Police Station Jaluki, Distirct Deeg Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Mr. Anoop Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 01/09/2025 1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Ajad @ Ajadi S/o Late Sh. Mamman in FIR No. 72/2025 dated 13.05.2025 registered at P.S. Jaluki District -Deeg, whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 238(A) of BNS and Section 3, 4, 6 and 8 of RBA Act. 2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further [2025:RJ-JP:35148] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11038/2025] assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required the applicant-accused will be available. He also submits that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that allegation on present petitioner is that Shahid, Iqbal and Islam have bought bovine animal from present petitioner after making payment of ₹28,000/-. He further submitted that persons from whom beef was recovered were granted bail by this Hon’ble Court and there is no record to show that present petitioner has committed any offence. He further referred criminal antecedents against the present petitioner and submitted that police has shown one case besides present one whereas in the order of trial court, four cases were shown and petitioner is not involved in any of the act. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. He submitted report received from concerned police station and same is taken on record. 6. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 7. On 13.08.2025, this Court has granted bail to Shahid, Iqbal and Islam from whom beef was allegedly recovered. The allegation on present petitioner is selling cow at price of ₹28,000/-. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, [2025:RJ-JP:35148] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11038/2025] looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Ajad @ Ajadi S/o Late Sh. Mamman, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /04