Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28971 (AP)

VANKAYALAPATI SRINIVAS v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/21112/2025 · 2025-08-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010413362025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) .V0? I THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21112 OF 2025 Between: Vankayalapati Srinivas, S/o. Kameswara Rao, Aged about 44 Principal, R/o.H.No.26-12-13/A, Boddapativari Vijayawada, NTR District years, Occ Street, Ghandi Nagar, ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Commissioner of Police, NTR Commissionarate, Vijayawada, NTR District. 4. The Station House Officer, Satyanarayanapuram Vijayawada City, NTR District. 5. Alapati Rajendra Prasad, S/o. Siva Rama Krishna, R/o.Lakshmi Guntur, Guntur District. Home Police Station Nagar ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents may be No.2 to 4 in not t providing appropriate adequate Police protection to the Petitioner of there is a even in spite severe life threat existing from the Respondent No.5 and others and repeated attacks have been made against the Petitioner including kidnap, extortion, frequent threatening calls visiting unsocial elements at the and put the Petitioner under residence and work place of the Petitioner coercion and threatening to kill him and his family members in case the illegal demands of the Respondent No.5 and others illegal and in violation of Article 14 and are not complied as arbitrary, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 to provide protection to the Petitioner to protect the Petitioner necessary police from the Respondent No.5 and others in the interest of justice lA NO: 1 OF 2n?f> Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 to provide necessary police protection to the Petitioner to protect the Petitioner from pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: the Respondent No.5 and others APHC010413362025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) {3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTEENTHDAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ’■■.A' PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRIVIAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21112/2025 Between: 1.VANKAYALAPATI SRINIVAS, S/O.KAMESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT TRtNOlRAL, T5CC BOTOARATTVARJ-STREET, GHANDl mOAR, VIJAYAWM3A, NTR DISTRICT ==PET!T[ONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NTR COMMISSIONARATE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SATYANARAYANAPURAM POLICE STATION VIJAYAWADA CITY, NTR DISTRICT. 5.ALAPATI RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/0.SIVA RAMA KRISHNA, R/O.LAKSHMI NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P NAGENDRA REDDY V 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following-prayer for;.. “...to issue a writ, order or.direction more particularly one in ther*iiatuFe ..of. wrib^of; Mandamus<io declare the action of the ftespondehts^-NcK2-tQ-4^in' rvot^'pr0y}dlng appropriate adequate Police protection to the Petitioner even in spite of there is a severe life threatsexisting fromsthe Respondent No;5 and others and repeated attacks have been made against the Petitioner including kidnap, extortion, frequent threatening calls, visiting unsocial elements at the residence and work place of the of the "ReSporrdehb'N^ and "others: are irot complied as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 to provide necessary police protection to the Petitioner to protect the Petitioner from the Respondent No.5 and others in the interest of justice. ” 1 / 2. Heard Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents. 3. Heard Sri P. Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are not providing police protection to the petitioner, in spite of there being a severe threat existing from the Respondent No.5, and a direction may be given to the police to give police protection to the petitioner. 4 m 5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. \ Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the respondent No.2 is directed to look into the grievance.of the petitioner and take an appropriate decision according to the governing rules and law as expeditiously as possible, but not later than five days from the date ofjjBceipt of.B copy;of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand Sd/- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6. closed. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 1. 2. The Director General of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, of Police, NTR Commissionarate, Vijayawada, NTR 3. The Commissioner District. 4. The Station House Officer, Satyanarayanapuram Vijayawada City, NTR District. 5. One CC to SRI P NAGENDRA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies Police Station gsg high court DATED; 14/08/2025 ORDER WPNO. 21112 OF 2025 ^ M AUG 2025 jNC^igent Sectiop^v Co 3- disposing the wp WITHOUT COSTS