[2025:RJ-JP:36992] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11018/2025 1. Karan Singh S/o Shri Jogendra Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dhani Khyaliram Wali Surewala Police Station Tb District Hanumangrah Raj (At Present Central Jail Jaipur Raj) 2. Ranjeet Singh S/o Shri Mangal Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dhani Dhani Khyaliram Wali Surewala Police Station Tb District Hanumangrah Raj (At Present Central Jail Jaipur Raj) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Assistant GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.286/2025 registered at Police Station Jaipur, District GRP Ajmer for the offence punishable under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest & there are no criminal antecedents of similar [2025:RJ-JP:36992] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11018/2025] nature against them. Trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, especially the fact that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity; trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1) Karan Singh S/o Shri Jogendra Singh & 2) Ranjeet Singh S/o Shri Mangal Singh, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. [2025:RJ-JP:36992] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11018/2025] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /146