APHC010413132018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 19076/2018 Between: 1. GOSANGI SATYANARAYANA, S/O VENKATA RATNAM, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO.1-225, ROCK CHURCH, NANDAMPUDI VILLAGE, AMBAJIPET MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMALAPURAM RURAL CIRCLE, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMBAJIPET POLICE STATION, AMBAJIPET VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM CITY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. KADALLI SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, S/O. LATE KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC GULF AGENT, SAKUR GUNNEPALLI, AGRAHARAM VILLAGE, AMALAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. CHALLAPUDI ANIL KUMAR, S/O.SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC:PRIVATE SERVICE, RIO.BOBBARLANKA VILLAGE, ATHREYAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. MULLETI RAMAKRISHNA KOPPADA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O.SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS. OCC:PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O. D.NO.4-20-8. THRINADH STREET, ALKART GARDENS RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM CITY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 5th respondent in not registering the crime on petitioner's complaint dated 10.04.2018 submitted against the respondents 7 to 9 and high handed interference of the 6th respondent with his personal life and liberty as illegal, irregular, irrational, amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on 5th respondent under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, violative of the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Rules, 1995 and Tribes Atrocities Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amended Act, 2015 and offends article 14 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 5th respondent to register the crime and prosecute the offenders for appropriate offences and penal provisions of law and also direct the 6th respondent not to interfere with his personal life and liberty and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SARATH KUMAR D Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 5th respondent in not registering the crime on petitioner's complaint dated 10.04.2018 submitted against the respondents 7 to 9 and high handed interference of the 6th respondent with his personal life and liberty as illegal, irregular, irrational, amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on 5th respondent under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, violative of the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Rules, 1995 and Tribes Atrocities Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amended Act, 2015 and offends article 14 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 5th respondent to register the crime and prosecute the offenders for appropriate offences and penal provisions of law and also direct the 6th respondent not to interfere with his personal life and liberty and pass ....” 3 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that this writ petition may be disposed of as no further orders are necessary. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 19076 of 2018 15.07.2025 Mjl /*