TONGBRAM KEVI @ ROJEN SINGH v. SMT. SOROKHAIBAM THAJAMANBI DEVI
CRP(C.R.P. Art.227)/16/2023 · 2025-11-10
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2895 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2895 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1
Item No. 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL CRP(CRP.Art.227) No. 16 of 2023
Tongbram Kevi @ Rojen Singh
Petitioner/s Vrs. Smt. Sorokhaibam Thajamanbi Devi
Respondent/s
BEFORE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR (ORDER) 11.11.2025
When the matter was taken up, Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel on record for revision petitioner and Mr. L. Heely Roy, learned counsel representing his senior Mr. Y. Daljeet, learned counsel for lone respondent are before this Court.
2. Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel on record for revision petitioner submits that he has instruction from the revision petitioner not to pursue the captioned ‘CRP’ as revision petitioner is accepting the order which is sought to be revised/matter has been settled saying so the learned counsel on record for revision petitioner has made an endorsement in the case file and scanned reproduction of the same is as follows.
JOHN TELEN KOM Digitally signed by JOHN TELEN KOM Date: 2025.11.12 00:26:08 -08'00'
Page 2
3. In the light of narrative thus far, captioned CRP is disposed of as withdrawn/closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE Ab. Surjit