Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Manipur · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2895 (MAN)

TONGBRAM KEVI @ ROJEN SINGH v. SMT. SOROKHAIBAM THAJAMANBI DEVI

CRP(C.R.P. Art.227)/16/2023 · 2025-11-10

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 Item No. 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL CRP(CRP.Art.227) No. 16 of 2023 Tongbram Kevi @ Rojen Singh Petitioner/s Vrs. Smt. Sorokhaibam Thajamanbi Devi Respondent/s BEFORE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR (ORDER) 11.11.2025 When the matter was taken up, Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel on record for revision petitioner and Mr. L. Heely Roy, learned counsel representing his senior Mr. Y. Daljeet, learned counsel for lone respondent are before this Court. 2. Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel on record for revision petitioner submits that he has instruction from the revision petitioner not to pursue the captioned ‘CRP’ as revision petitioner is accepting the order which is sought to be revised/matter has been settled saying so the learned counsel on record for revision petitioner has made an endorsement in the case file and scanned reproduction of the same is as follows. JOHN TELEN KOM Digitally signed by JOHN TELEN KOM Date: 2025.11.12 00:26:08 -08'00' Page 2 3. In the light of narrative thus far, captioned CRP is disposed of as withdrawn/closed. There shall be no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE Ab. Surjit