[2025:RJ-JP:36996] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 11033/2025 Govind Parihar S/o Shivsingh, R/o Khaikheda, Surjana, Police Station Shyamgarh, District Mandsaur (M.p.) (At Present Ac- cused Confined In District Jail, Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Assistant GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/09/2025 1. This third bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.149/2019 registered at Police Station Mandana, District Kota Rural, for the offences under Sections 8/15 & 8/29 of NDPS Act. 2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the present matter is of bail jump. Counsel submits that due to unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner could not appear before the learned trial Court and as such, his bail bonds has been forfeited and warrant of arrest has been issued against him. Counsel submits that the petitioner undertakes to appear before the learned trial Court on each and every date as fixed by the trial Court. He further submits that he has already deposited fine imposed by the learned trial Court under Section 446 of Cr.P.C. He thus, prays that [2025:RJ-JP:36996] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11033/2025] the bail application may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the overall facts & circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced at bar, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This third bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner-Govind Parihar S/o Shivsingh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /149