IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.3195 of 2025 Date of Decision: 8.4.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Gupt Ram and Anr. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Subhash Mohan Snehi and Ms. Bhavinta, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Ratatn, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the petitioners, on instructions, states that the petitioners would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide case of the petitioners in light of judgment dated 342 of 2021 titled Yashwant Singh and Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. in a time bound manner. 2. While putting appearance on behalf of the respondents, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, fairly states that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioners. - 2 - 3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide their case in light of Yashwant Singh (supra) expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and pass a speaking order thereupon. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, if they still remain aggrieved. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. April 8, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge