Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28947 (AP)

DADI LOVARAJU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/21148/2024 · 2025-07-21

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010413212024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 21148/2024 Between: 1. DADI LOVARAJU, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 34 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O H.NO. 4-24, MAMIDADA VILLAGE, JAGGAMPETA, MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise Department), Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not returning the FDR bearing No.62491524091 dt.29-11-2016 for Rs.1,80,000/- drawn on State Bank of India, Yeleswaram Branch, E.G. District, deposited by the petitioner at the time of granting interim custody of the vehicle bearing Reg. No.AP-5-TC-5718 seized in relation to FIR No.195/2016-17, on the file of the 3rd respondent, despite quashing of the said FIR pursuant to the orders passed in CrI.P.No. 4457 of 2019 dt. 9.3.2022, in spite of the notice dt. 23-8-2024, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional, and to grant such other relief or reliefs IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2ndrespondent herein to return the the FDR bearing No. 62491524091 dt. 29-11-2016 for Rs.1,80,000/- drawn on State Bank of India, Yeleswaram Branch, E.G.District, deposited by the petitioner at the time of granting interim custody of the vehicle bearing Reg. No. AP-5-TC-5718 seized in relation to FIR No. 195/2016-17, on the file of the 3rd respondent, despite quashing of the said FIR pursuant to the orders passed in CrI.P.No. 4457 of 2019 dt.9.3.2022, by considering the notice dt. 23-8-2024, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE The Court made the following: ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD